Third workshop: Research
Here’s a rough translation of the report from the third workshop of the national assembly of Onda (15-16 November at Sapienza, Rome).
Third workshop: Research, Education and Work
In the third workshop of the national assembly we discussed the themes of research, education and work.
All the institutional interventions of the last 15 years have aimed to destructure the public university system: reforms on didactics, cuts of funding, the block of turn-over, transformation of universities into private foundations.
However we want to clarify that The Wave is not defending a system that doesn’t function. The responsability belongs to those have managed the university with corporative and clientelistic mechanisms; to those who by hierarchizing the university suffocate research. The responsability belongs to those who have constructed a system founded on generalized exploitation of precarious labor; to those who have accepted the idea of drastically restricting the access to quality public education.
Because of this we feel that in this phase, in the profound crisis of the neoliberal model, there’s an urgent need for a university capable of contributing to the construction of a new and more just model of development. Our point of departure is the analysis of the research concretely produced by our universities and institutes, of how this interacts with the territory, the creation of critical knowledge, and the multiplication of experiences of self-education (autoformazione) and alternative didactics which we have been producing in our mobilizations.
This analysis has brought up a set of guidelines:
1. Independence and autonomy of research are the foundational principles for us. Research must not be subordinate to market logics nor put into service of private interests. Knowledge is a collective product, and as such, it is not appropriable. Free research cannot exist without autonomous and independent researchers, therefore the access to funds for non structured researchers and PhD students is a fundamental condition for us.
2. The autonomy of research and the quality of the public university require a new concept for valuation. (…) We think that valuation should be seen also as social account of the university system in its entirety. We also underline that docents, researchers and PhD students should be involved in the processes of valuation.
3. The problem of income is certainly concerns the whole living body of the university: PhD students and precarious researchers.
There should be an adequate salary that corresponds to the research work, and constitutional workers’ rights. All work must be contractual. The continuity of income must be guaranteed, and it must be extended to all precarious workers.
4. Adequate didactical paths and the right to economic autonomy must be guaranteed to all doctors (…)
5. We underline our firm opposition to the block of turn-over. But this is not enough for us: we demand the institution of a single contract of subordinate work (…) a contract which would substitute the current jungle of precarious "contracts" (…)
6. Precarious researchers and PhD students are completely absent from the decision-making bodies. Like every other category, they should participate in the decision-making processes through elected representatives.
7. The Wave has already gone beyond national borders. In Europe there have been solidarity demonstrations for the Italian movement,.
We want to underline that there doesn’t exist any european space of research yet. The movement must start creating it through the circulation of ideas and struggles.
8. In research, the question of gender remains open, the question which we find everywhere in the world of work: on one hand, the career development of women is strongly filtered to lower levels, on the other hand women suffer from the old biological blackmail in which motherhood becomes the way of expulsion from the world of research.
9. Self-reform (autoriforma) is above all a shared path of struggles.
This workshop expressed a multiplicity of roads which can be traversed on local and national level. But we think that even more roads will come out from the fantasy of this movement, from the force of participation that it is creating, from the capacity to experiment with new paths. The movement must last, we know that our struggle will take long time, but we also know that, at least for this country, it’s a great occasion and a great hope.